Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Research in Nursing
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hendry, C.
Right arrow Articles by Roxburgh, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The dissemination and uptake of competency frameworks

Charles Hendry

School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Dundee Ninewells Hospital Dundee, UK

William Lauder

School of Nursing & Midwifery University of Dundee, UK

Michelle Roxburgh

School of Nursing & Midwifery University of Dundee, UK

Clinical competencies are increasingly being used to structure career and clinical progression in post-registration nursing. Competency framework documents have been proposed as a way of supporting competence development. One major national initiative in this respect is the NHS Education for Scotland (NES) competency frameworks which have seen development of over 26 such frameworks dealing with a wide range of nursing specialties.

Utilising an initial scoping study followed by a stakeholder evaluation the dissemination and uptake of a selected number of competency frameworks was investigated. Participants in the scoping study (n = 18) and in the main stakeholder survey ( n = 24) from a sample of Health Boards and Higher Education Institutions were recruited. Data were collected by telephone and face-to-face interviews.

Within the NHS and HEI's the specified framework documents have a variable penetration. Documents are used to support CPD at the individual and organisational levels. They also inform, albeit in a very limited way, curricular developments in HEIs. The success of framework documents is linked to their timeliness in relation to local and national developments such as service redesign and to whether or not documents were `championed' by committed practitioners or professional groups.

Competency framework documents are recognised and utilised by clinicians, NHS managers and Education providers. Information providers and users need to co-ordinate their initiatives in order that staff development links with service redesign.

Key Words: competency • competencies • competency frameworks • stakeholder evaluation

References

  • Australian Nursing and Midwifery Council. (2000) Position Statement: Continuing Competence in Nursing. Dickson ACT: Australian Nursing and Midwifery Council.
  • Baulcomb, S., Watson, R. (2003) The internal consistency and intra-rater reliability of an assessment practice grid for community nurses. Clinical Effectiveness in Nursing 7: 168—170.[CrossRef]
  • Bench, S., Crowe, D., Day, T., Jones, M., Wilebore, S. (2003) Developing a competency framework for critical care to match patient need. Intensive & Critical Care Nursing 19: 3, 136—42.
  • Berelson, B. (1952) Content Analysis in Communication Research. New York: Free Press.
  • Crd. (1999) Effective Healthcare: Getting Evidence into Practice. NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. University of York, Royal Society of Medicine Press. www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd.
  • Clarke, A., Dawson, R. (1999) Evaluation Research: An Introduction of Principles, Methods and Practice. London: Sage.
  • Daly, W.M., Carnwell, R. (2003) Nursing roles and levels of practice: a framework for differentiating between elementary, specialist and advancing nursing practice. Journal of Clinical Nursing 12: 2, 158—167.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Dawes, M. (2000) Evidence-Based Practice: A Primer for Healthcare Professionals. London: Churchill Livingstone.
  • Durgahee, T. (2003) Higher level practice: degree of specialist practice? Nurse Education Today 23: 3, 191—201.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Eccles, M., Grimshaw, J. (2000) (eds) Clinical Guidelines: From conception to Use. Abingdon, Oxon: Radcliffe Medical Press.
  • Fulbrook, P. (1996) Advanced practice: do we know what it is? Nursing in Critical Care 1: 1, 9—12.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Girot, E.A. (2000) Assessment of graduates and diplomats in practice in the UK — are we measuring the same level of competence. Journal of Clinical Nursing 9: 330—337.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Hammersley, M., Atkinson, P. (1995) Ethnography — Principles in Practice. London: Routledge.
  • Hughes, E. (2005) Nurses' perceptions of continuing professional development. Nursing Standard 19: 4 3, 41—49.
  • Jones, M. (2002) Critical care competencies. Nursing in Critical Care 7: 3, 111—120.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Le May, A. (1999) Evidence-Based Practice. Nursing Times Clinical Monographs No1. London: Nursing Times Books.
  • McMullan, M., Endacott, R., Gray, M.A., Jasper, M., Miller, C.M.L., Scholes, J., Webb, C. (2003) Portfolios and assessment of competence: a review of literature. Journal of Advanced Nursing 41: 3, 283—294.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Meretoja, R., Isoaho, H., Leino-Kilpi, H. (2004) Nurse competence scale: development and psychometric testing. Journal of Advanced Nursing 47: 2, 124—133.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Miser, W. (2000). Critical appraisal of the literature: How to assess an article and still enjoy life. In: Geyman, J.P., Deyo, R.A., Ramsay, S.D. Evidence-Based Clinical Practice: Concepts and Approaches. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
  • Mulhall, A., Le May, A. (1999) Nursing Research Dissemination and Implementation. London: Churchill Livingstone.
  • Nursing & Midwifery Council (2005) Implementation of a framework for the standard for post registration nursing (Advanced Nurse Practice). http://www.nmc-uk.org/aFrameDisplay.aspx?DocumentID=1669, accessed 12/2/07.
  • Oppenheim, C. (1997) Managers' use and handling of information. International Journal of Information Management 17: 4, 239—248.[CrossRef]
  • Ormrod, G., Casey, D. (2004) The educational preparation of nursing staff undertaking pre-assessment of surgical patients — a discussion of the issues. Nurse Education Today 24: 256—262.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Parahoo, K., McCaughan, E.M. (2001) Research utilization among medical and surgical nurses: a comparison of their self reports and perceptions of barriers and facilitators. Journal of Nursing Management 9: 21—30.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Patton, M.Q. (2002) Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Pearson, A., FitzGerald, M. (2001) A survey of nurses' views on indicators for continuing competence in nursing. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing 19: 1, 20—6.
  • Quinn, F.M. (1995) The Principles and Practice of Nurse Education, 3rd edn. London: Chapman-Hall.
  • Robson, C. (2002) Real World Research. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Roxburgh, M. (2006) An exploration of factors which constrain nurses from research participation. Journal of Clinical Nursing 15: 5, 535—545.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Rong, J., Chung, U. (2006) The challenge facing nursing education: to develop clinical performance examination strategies in nursing. Journal of Nursing (China) 53: 1, 17—21.
  • Ryan-Nichols, K. (2003) Educational needs of psychiatric nurses for continuing competency. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing 34: 5, 218—225.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Scottish Executive Health Department. (2002 ) Choices and Challenges: The Strategy for Research and Development in Nursing and Midwifery in Scotland. Edinburgh: The Stationery Office.
  • Scottish Executive Health Department. (2001 ) Caring for Scotland. The Strategy for Nursing Midwifery in Scotland. Edinburgh: NHS Scotland.
  • Simpson, C.W., Prusak, L. (1995) Troubles with information overload — moving from quantity to quality in information provision. International Journal of Information Management 15: 6, 413—425.[CrossRef]
  • Stephen, H. (1998) Higher calling... end the current confusion surrounding post-registration qualifications. Nursing Standard 12: 48, 12.
  • Ukcc. (1990) The Report of the Registration Education and Practice Project. London: UKCC.
  • Ukcc. (1993) The Council's Proposed Standards for Post-Registration Education. LONDON: United Kingdom Central Council for Nursing, Midwifery, and Health Visiting.
  • Ukcc. (1996) The nature of advanced practice: an interim report. London: United Kingdom Central Council for Nursing, Midwifery, and Health Visiting.
  • Ukcc. (2001) Standards for Specialist Education and Practice. London: UKCC.
  • Watson, R. (2002) Clinical competence: Starship Enterprise or straitjacket. Nurse Education Today 22: 476—480.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Wright, K., Rowitz, L., Merkle, A., Reid, W.M., Robinson, G., Herzog, B., Weber, D., Carmichael, D., Balderson, T.R., and Baker, E. (2000) Competency development in public health leadership. American Journal of Public Health 90: 1202—1207.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Whittaker, S., Smolenski, M. and Carson, W., (2000): Assuring continued competence — policy questions and approaches: how should the profession respond? Online Journal of Issues in Nursing. Available http://www.nursing-world.org/ojin/topic10/tpc10_4.htm, accessed 23rd February 2006.

Journal of Research in Nursing, Vol. 12, No. 6, 689-700 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1744987107079652
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hendry, C.
Right arrow Articles by Roxburgh, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?