This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Barr, O. Articles by McConkey, R. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

A different type of appointment: the experiences of parents who have children with intellectual disabilities referred for genetic investigation

Institute of Nursing Research and School of Nursing Magee Campus, University of Ulster, Londonderry, UK, o.barr{at}ulster.ac.uk

Roy McConkey

Institute of Nursing Research and School of Nursing Jordanstown Campus, University of Ulster, Newtownabbey, UK

Current research endeavours in genetics largely concentrate on developing more effective approaches to genetic investigation and treatment for individuals. By contrast, less attention has been paid to the impact of genetic referral on the parents of children undergoing investigation, in particular which aspects of the referral process that contribute to increased anxiety reported by parents attending a genetics appointment. The overall aim of this project was to gain an understanding of the experience of parents who have a child referred for genetic investigation. This paper reports how parents perceived an appointment with a geneticist as being `different' from appointments with other doctors they had attended. Using an Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) design information was obtained using preappointment self-completion questionnaires with 19 parents that they completed in the two weeks prior to their appointment. After the appointment semi-structured interviews with 17 of these parents within three months of the appointment with the geneticist. In addition, a second interview with 10 parents (of the above 17 parents) for whom genetic investigation were continuing was completed approximately nine months following their initial appointment with the geneticist. All parents who agreed to participate in this study were parents of children with intellectual disabilities. Overall, four superordinate themes were identified, these were: seeking information — the wider context; a different type of appointment; interpreting information and experiences and parents' changing perspectives. The findings reinforce the findings of previous studies that have highlighted the desire of parents to receive an explanation of their child's condition, the wider impact of being referred to and attending an appointment with a geneticist and the role that receiving a diagnosis can play in parents' process of adaptation to their child's condition. However, this study provided a new insight into how parents perceive their appointment with a geneticist as being different from other doctors they have attended. The findings of this study highlight the need to recognise the different manner in which parents perceive an appointment with a geneticist in comparison with appointments with other doctors. The illumination of the perceived `differentness' that parents have prior to and during an appointment with a geneticist appointment provides a new insight into why parents may be anxious as a result of the processes involved. In seeking to support the parents of children referred to a geneticist, health professionals should identify parents' understanding and expectations of the appointment and provide timely information and support in order to assist parents prepare for the appointment and make maximum use of this opportunity to raise and understand new information.

Key Words: parents • genetic investigation • psychosocial impact • intellectual disability

References

• Arbuzova, S., Cuckle, H., Mueller, R., Sehmi, I. (2001) Familial Down syndrome: evidence supporting cytoplasmic inheritance. Clinical Genetics 60: 456—462.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Barr, O., Millar, R. (2003) Parents of children with intellectual disabilities: their expectations and experience of genetic counselling. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 16(3):189—204.[CrossRef]
• Barr, O. (2002) Developments in genetic understanding: time to engage with the process. Journal of Learning Disabilities 6(1): 5—12.[Free Full Text]
• Beauchesne, M.A. (2002) Genetics is advancing us on. Where do we go from here? Journal of Learning Disabilities 6: 4, 331—335.[Free Full Text]
• Brain, K., Soldan, J., Sampson, J., Gray, J. (2003) Genetic counselling protocols for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer: a survey of UK regional genetics centres. Clinical Genetics 63:198—204.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Carmichael, B., Pembery, M., Turner, G., Barnicoat, A. (1999) Diagnosis of Fragile-X syndrome: the experiences of parents. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 43(1): 47—53.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Catrinel Marinescu, R., Jonhson, E.I., Grady, D., Xiao-Ning, C., Overhauser, J. (1999) FISH analysis of terminal deletions in patients diagnosed with cri-du-chat syndrome. Clinical Genetics 56: 282—288.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Chapman, E., Smith, J. (2002) Interpretative phenomenological analysis and the new genetics. Journal of Health Psychology 7(2):125—130.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Collins, V., Halliday, J., Kahler, S., Williamson, R. (2001) Parents' experiences with genetic counseling after the birth of a baby with a genetic disorder: an exploratory study. Journal of Genetic Counseling 10(1): 53—72.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Conrad, P. (1999) Use of expertise: sources, quotes and voice in reporting of genetics in the news. Public Understanding of Science 8, 285—302.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Daniel, B., Taylor, J. (2001) Engaging with Fathers. Practice Issues for Health And Social Care. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
• Dinc, L.,Terzioglu, F. (2006) The psychological impact of genetic testing on parents. Journal of Clinical Nursing 15: 45—51.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Foundation for People with Learning Disabilities (2005) First Impressions: Emotional and practical support needs for families of a young child with learning disabilities. London: Foundation for People with a Learning Disability.
• Gatford, A. (2001) Down's syndrome: experiences of mothers from different cultures. British Journal of Nursing 10(18): 1193—1199.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Gibbs, G.R. (2002) Qualitative Data Analysis: Explorations with NVivo. Open University Press Buckingham.
• Grant, G., Nolan, M., Keady, J. (2003) Supporting families over the life course: mapping temporality. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 47(4—5): 342—352.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Harper, P. (2004) Practical Genetic Counselling, 6th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Hatton, C., Akram, Y., Robertson, J., Shah, R., Emerson, E. (2003) The disclosure process and its impact on South Asian Families with a child with severe intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 16(3):177—188.[CrossRef]
• Human Genetics Commission (2002) Inside Information: Balancing Interests In The Use Of Personal Genetic Data. London: Department of Health Publications.
• Kay, E., Kingston, H. (2002) Feelings associated with being a carrier and characteristics of reproductive decision making in women known to be carriers of X-linked conditions. Journal of Health Psychology 7(2): 169—182.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Khalifa, M.M., Struthers, J.L. (2002) Klinefelter syndrome is a common cause for mental retardation of unknown etiology among prepubertal males. Clinical Genetics 61: 49—53.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• MacLeod, R., Booth, K., Crauford, D. (2002) Patients' perceptions of what makes genetic counselling effective: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. Journal of Health Psychology 7(2): 145—156.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• McConkie-Rosell, A., Spiridigliozzi, G.A., Sullivan, J.A., Dawson, D.V., Lachiewicz, A.M. (2000) Carrier testing in fragile-X syndrome: effect on self concept. American Journal of Medical Genetics 92: 336—342.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Maxwell, V., Barr, O. (2003) With the benefit of hindsight: a mother's reflection on raising a child with Down Syndrome. Journal of Learning Disabilities 7(1): 51—64.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Miller, N.B., Burmester, S., Callahan, D.G., Dieterle, J., Niedermeyer, S. (1994) Nobody's Perfect. Baltimore, Paul H. Brookes
• Parrington, K. (2002) Maternal response to the diagnosis of learning disabilities in children. Journal of Learning Disabilities 6(2): 163—173.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Petersen, A., Bunton, R. (eds.) (2002) The New Genetics and the Public's Health. London: Routledge.
• QSR International (2002) QSR NVivo 2. Melbourne: QSR International
• Rolph, S., Atkinson, D., Nind, M., Welshamn, J. (eds.) (2005) Witnesses to Change: Families, Learning Difficulties and History. Kidderminster: British Institute of Learning Disabilities.
• Shaw, C., Abrams, K., Marteau, T. (1999) Psychological impact of predicting individual's risk of illness: a systematic review. Social Science and Medicine 49: 1571—1598.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Skirton, H. (2001) The client's perspective of genetic counselling — a grounded theory study. Journal of Genetic Counseling 10(4): 311—329.[CrossRef]
• Skirton, H. (2006) Parental experience of a pediatric genetic referral. American Journal of Maternal and Child Nursing 31(3): 178—184.[CrossRef]
• Smith, J. (2004) Reflecting on the development of interpretative phenomenological analysis and its contribution to qualitative research in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 1: 39—54.
• Smith, J., Osborn, M. (2003) Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In Smith, J.A. (ed.) Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods (51—80). London: Sage
• Spinath, F., Harlaar, N., Ronald,A., Plomin, R. (2004) Substantial genetic influence in mild mental impairment in early childhood. American Journal of Mental Retardation 109(1): 34—43.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Willig, C. (ed.) (2001) Interpretative phenomenology. Introducing Qualitative Research in Psychology: Adventures in Theory and Method (50—69). Buckingham: Open University Press.
• Winnepenninckx, B., Rooms, L., Kooy, R. (2003) Mental retardation: a review of genetic causes. British Journal of Developmental Disabilities 49(1): 29—44.

Journal of Research in Nursing, Vol. 12, No. 6, 637-652 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1744987107083516


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Barr, O. Articles by McConkey, R. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?