This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Meerabeau, L. Articles by Clayton, J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Research Governance Framework for Health and Social Care: Implications for developing research in primary care

School of Health and Social Care, University of Greenwich, Avery Hill Road, Eltham, London SE9 2UG; Telephone: 020 8331 9150; Fax: 020 8331 8060E.meerabeau{at}gre.ac.uk

Annmarie Ruston, MSc, PhD, PGCE

School of Health and Social Care, University of Greenwich

Julie Clayton, BA, MSc

The Research Governance Framework for Health and Social Care is a framework of responsibilities and quality checks formulated by the English Department of Health for researchers and others. Primary care trusts were required to comply with the RGF by April 1, 2003. Implementing research governance within primary care trusts includes establishing systems for being notified of any research activity, peer review and scientific support.

This paper discusses findings arising from research commissioned in south London in 2003 by one of the national pilot sites for research governance in primary care. Data were gathered by means of telephone interviews with 23 experienced academics within the four south London higher education institutions included in the project. In particular, the paper explores issues concerning the effects of the research government framework on student projects, and the implications of these for the development of research capacity in primary care.

A key message from this paper is that primary care research is still quite fragile, and that a heavy-handed introduction of research governance may deter neophytes and hamper research capacity-building. In particular, the withdrawal of higher education institutions from requiring primary datagathering for MScs because of the increasing hurdles of bureaucracy could make it more difficult for experienced practitioners to develop research skills.

Key Words: Research governance framework • Primary care research • Research capacity-building • Student research projects • Research and development management • Principal investigator

Nursing Times Research, Vol. 9, No. 6, 421-429 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/136140960400900602


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?