Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Nursing Times Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Normand, C.
Right arrow Articles by Bentley, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Research ethics and complex studies

Charles Normand, DPhil, BA

London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine

Julienne Meyer, PhD, MSc, CertEd(FE), RGN, RNT

St Bartholomew School of Nursing and Midwifery, City University, London

Jane Bentley, MSc, RGN, RHV

St Bartholomew School of Nursing and Midwifery, City University, London

The operation of research ethics committees in England now follows standard procedures. However, the new ethical review process favours research where research questions and protocols can be clearly specified in advance of the study. While this may not be problematic for those conducting clinical trials, it can prove more difficult for qualitative researchers seeking to study complex and changing environments, such as the health service. Here, the changing nature of the services being investigated and the emphasis placed on involving users and carers in the research process, makes it hard to predict methods in advance of the study. This paper argues for greater flexibility within the ethical review process better to respond to the needs not only of this type of research, but also to other research and development activities, such as audit and practice development. It highlights the need for trust, ongoing dialogue, approval of frameworks and codes of practice.

Key Words: Ethics committees • Qualitative methods • Health services research • Action research

Nursing Times Research, Vol. 8, No. 1, 17-26 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/136140960300800104


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Research in NursingHome page
L. Meerabeau, A. Ruston, and J. Clayton
The Research Governance Framework for Health and Social Care: Implications for developing research in primary care
Journal of Research in Nursing, November 1, 2004; 9(6): 421 - 429.
[Abstract] [PDF]