This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Douglas, P. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

An evaluation study to assess the consistency of criteria for an integrated care pathway for total hip replacement

Bassetlaw Hospital and Community Services NHS Trust, Bassetlaw General Hospital, Kilton, Worksop, Nottinghamshire

This paper seeks to highlight that integrated care pathways (ICPs), advocated as a tool to improve patient care and reduce variation in practice, fail to achieve the desired outcome. An evaluation tool was developed based on relevant literature, and 27 pathways from different trusts were reviewed using this tool. Each ICP was evaluated against four themed headings: Quality of care; Multiprofessional working; Patient involvement, and Variation in clinical practice. The evaluation demonstrated that ICPs are in themselves as varied as patient care, and not all they are purported to be.

Key Words: Integrated care pathways • Quality • Variation in practice • Multiprofessional • Total hip replacement

Nursing Times Research, Vol. 7, No. 2, 129-137 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/136140960200700208


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?