Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Nursing Times Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hall, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A qualitative survey of staff responses to an integrated care pathway pilot study in a mental healthcare setting

Julie Hall, BSc(Hons), RMN, CertHSM

University of Nottingham

This qualitative study set out to discover a multidisciplinary team's impressions of an integrated care pathway pilot. Specific aims were: to explore participants' beliefs about the effectiveness and limitations of the pilot and its impact on practice, and to use the findings to develop recommendations for the future of integrated care pathways within the clinical area. The research setting was an in-patient dementia assessment service, forming part of the mental health directorate of an NHS trust in the east of England. Data were generated through semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of the multidisciplinary team, based on the premise that a qualitative approach develops an insider view of the team's experiences, beliefs and perceptions. Theoretical analysis was conducted, based on the analytical framework described, and facilitated through the use of QSR.NUD.IST IV content analysis software. Four categories emerged, which focused on: the clinical impact of the pathway; team performance; pathway effectiveness; and practice development.

The team's impressions corroborated experiences of integrated care pathways outlined in the literature. Benefits identified by the team were the pathway's influence on managing care, increased efficiency, better team working and perceived positive impact on the experience of patient and carer. Particular new insights focused on the pathway's impact on professional roles and responsibilities. The study indicated that the pathway concept was adaptable to this mental health setting and that benefits had been derived. The study's limitations are the inherent complexities associated with validity and reliability. Recommendations relate to local evaluation of the integrated care pathway pilot and wider research considerations.

Key Words: Integrated care pathway • Mental health • Multidisciplinary working

Nursing Times Research, Vol. 6, No. 3, 696-705 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/136140960100600309


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?