This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Plant, H. Articles by Corner, J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Working with resistance, tension and objectivity: Conducting a randomised controlled trial of a nursing intervention for breathlessness

Centre of Cancer and Palliative Care studies, Institute of Cancer Research, Royal Marsden NHS Trust, London

Mary Bredin, MA, RGN

Centre of Cancer and Palliative Care studies, Macmillan practice Development unit, Institute of Cancer Research, Royal Marsden NHS Trust, London

Meinir Krishnasamy, MSc, BA, RGN, DipN

Centre of Cancer and Palliative Care studies, Macmillan practice Development unit, Institute of Cancer Research, Royal Marsden NHS Trust, London

Jessica Corner, PhD, BSc, RGN

Centre of Cancer and Palliative Care studies, Institute of Cancer Research, Royal Marsden NHS Trust, London

It is vital that nurses wishing to recommend or introduce new strategies are able to provide supporting evidence that is acceptable to their colleagues. The methodology from which to derive such evidence remains to be clearly defined, as the research process is complex, demanding and, to a certain extent, uncharted. This paper examines the experience of nurses collaborating in a multi-centre randomised controlled trial which evaluated a nursing intervention for the management of breathlessness in patients with lung cancer. The study raised several important methodological issues: resistance among colleagues to innovative nursing practice; the difficulty of measuring well-being in patients whose physical condition is deteriorating; maintaining uniformity of practice within a diverse group of collaborating nurse researchers; and the tension between the nursing role and the necessity of an ethically demanding research design.

Analysis of the process of conducting a randomised controlled trial produced valuable insights which indicated the kind of support required to undertake research and successfully implement a new intervention into clinical practice. The study also highlighted the problems associated with asking ill people to complete standard measurement tools, particularly when such instruments might not be sensitive to the reality of the patient(s) problem, in this case, the experience of breathlessness.

Key Words: Breathlessness • Nursing clinic • Randomised controlled trial

Nursing Times Research, Vol. 5, No. 6, 426-434 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/136140960000500606


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Corner and J. Harewood Exploring the use of complementary and alternative medicine by people with cancer Journal of Research in Nursing, March 1, 2004; 9(2): 101 - 109. [Abstract] [PDF]