Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Nursing Times Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sale, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Is quality assurance in nursing research-based?

Diana Sale, RGN, RCNT

1066 Consultancy

This paper attempts to answer the controversial question: 'Is quality assurance in nursing research-based?' The argument put forward is whether or not the off-the-shelf monitoring tools which originated, and were researched and piloted, in the US, offer research-based quality assurance following their migration to nursing in the UK. The paper includes a brief history of quality assurance and an overview of some of the most commonly-used quality assurance tools, including Monitor, Qualpacs and Phaneuf's Nursing Audit. The paper further explores the use of standards and integrated care pathways as systems for monitoring the quality of care, and whether or not standards set for evidence-based care and integrated care pathways based on sound research result in research-based quality assurance in nursing.

Key Words: Quality assurance • Standards • Education

Nursing Times Research, Vol. 5, No. 6, 416-423 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/136140960000500604


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?