Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Nursing Times Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cole, N.
Right arrow Articles by Foxcroft, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Benchmarking evidence-based nursing

Nick Cole, BSc(Hons), RN

Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth

Linda F. Tucker, BSc(Hons), RGN, DPSN

Nursing and Midwifery Research Group, Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, St Mary's Hospital, Portsmouth

David R. Foxcroft, PhD, RGN

Oxford Centre for Health Care Research & Development (OCHRAD), Headington, Oxford

The aim of this formative evaluation (action research) study was to develop and apply a set of criteria for benchmarking evidence-based nursing. There were three phases: the identification (through literature searches and contact with experts) of previous work on the development and assessment of evidence-based nursing; the development (through a consultation exercise) of criteria for measuring and benchmarking evidence-based nursing; and applying these criteria (through semi-structured interviews) in six discrete clinical areas.

Numerous papers were found that discussed evidence-based nursing and barriers to research utilisation, but no previous work on benchmarking or assessing evidence-based nursing was found. Fourteen 'benchmarking evidence-based nursing' criteria were developed, organised around four key themes for achieving effective practice: Selecting a particular aspect of practice to question or examine; finding out from the literature, professional networks and other sources what is current best practice, and critically appraising the available literature and sources of information; implementing and/or learning how to provide best-known clinical practice; and confirming that you are providing best practice.

All six clinical areas were generally poor on all 14 benchmarking criteria. However, there were some positive attributes: nurses with degree level post-registration education had better knowledge of searching for and critically appraising research; some senior clinical specialists were supportive of evidence-based changes; and one ward had stronger communication/dissemination links for relevant evidence with related clinical areas (paediatrics).

It was concluded that the benchmarking tool developed in the study was useful in identifying positive and negative aspects of evidence-based nursing practice. The tool may be helpful to other organizations considering how to take forward evidence-based nursing practice.

Key Words: Benchmarking • Evidence-based nursing • Formative education

Nursing Times Research, Vol. 5, No. 5, 336-344 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/136140960000500503
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Journal of Research in NursingHome page
C. Normand, H.-R. Doagllas, and E. Castelnuovo
Quality in nursing care: Context, complexity and the role of professions
Journal of Research in Nursing, November 1, 2000; 5(6): 407 - 415.
[Abstract] [PDF]