Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Research in Nursing
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bradley, S. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

There for us': Exploring preceptorship among newly qualified Child Branch staff nurses

Susan F. Bradley, BSc, MSc, Cert. Ed., RN, RSCN, RHV

Postgraduate Division of Nursing, Medical School, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham

A qualitative study (N=6) was undertaken examining the experiences of newly qualified staff nurses following Project 2000 Child Branch education, within which the experience of preceptorship was explored. All staff had an allocated preceptor, but experienced the process with varying degrees of success. In-depth interviews were undertaken at five months post-qualifying: content analysis of the data revealed a number of themes relating to the process of preceptorship, and the staff nurses' views of factors which either promoted or hindered its effectiveness. Factors contributing to successful preceptorship appeared to be: the availability of the preceptor; planning of learning objectives; ongoing feedback regarding progress; the enthusiasm and commitment of the preceptors for their role. In no case did preceptorship appear to have a formal structure and it was unclear what criteria would be used to assess staff performance at the end of the preceptorship period. This paper examines the background to preceptorship and the debate concerning its structure and intended outcomes. The experiences of the study participants are then examined in the light of this discussion. The study identifies some fundamental questions about the nature and process of preceptorship.

Key Words: Preceptorship • Project 2000 • Child Branch • Newly qualified staff nurses

Journal of Research in Nursing, Vol. 4, No. 3, 211-219 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/136140969900400311


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?