Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Nursing Times Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mulhall, A.
Right arrow Articles by Alexander, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Bridging the research-practice gap: A reflective account of research work

Anne Mulhall, BSc, MSc, PhD

Andrée Le May, BSc, PhD, RGN

Brunel University, and Canterbury Christchurch, university College

Caroline Alexander, BSc, RGN

Foundation of Nursing Studies, London

A growing body of knowledge attests to the idea that research is socially constructed. As such, researchers and the context of research may affect the types of questions which are posed, the methodologies used and the interpretation of the results. In nursing this has led to calls for a greater espousal of reflexivity by researchers, and a plea for a more open and critical reporting of the `process' of research. This study is a response to this plea. It describes the process by which the authors of a study which examined the culture of research in three NHS trusts, reflected on, and attempted to expose, hitherto hidden factors which affected the work. The methods used were bracketing, reflective diaries and a post-analysis reflective discussion. Thematic analysis of these data indicated that several factors related to both the experience and the background of the authors, and the context of the study affected its course. The reflective process was also valuable in unearthing certain `taken for granted knowledge' which, if acted on earlier, would have improved the rigour of the work. The authors advocate that researchers and funders need to reflect in a more structured way on the studies that they pursue. Furthermore, this open style of reporting may assist in bridging the gap between academics and practitioners by illustrating some of the dilemmas, uncertainties and contingencies which affect most research projects.

Key Words: Research-practice gap • Reflexivity • Construction of research

Nursing Times Research, Vol. 4, No. 2, 119-130 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/136140969900400206


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?