Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Nursing Times Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Redfern, S.
Right arrow Articles by Murrells, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Research, audit and networking activity in nursing development units

Sally Redfern

Trevor Murrells

This paper compares the progress made by NDUs, in comparison with matched units without NDU status, on research, audit and networking activities. We focus on two activities: (a) for research: involvement by staff in research, resources acquired and dissemination activity through publication and conference presentation and (b) for audit and networking: information on completed and current audits, and details of visits made by staff to and from other organisations. The data are drawn from questionnaires and interviews to the clinical leaders and staff and reports prepared by NDU-comparator pairs. Research and dissemination activity, though not high, are significantly greater (p<0.01) in NDUs than comparators. NDUs have a more widespread research culture as measured by involvement in research by all grades of staff. Research in NDUs focuses on local attempts to improve practice and has some way to go before it can be generalised into healthcare settings beyond the unit where it was carried out.

There is no difference in number of audits undertaken by NDUs and comparators but NDUs carried out more audits to evaluate nursing work and comparators did proportionately more on practice topics and user issues. There is no association between research and audit activity; more audit does not result in less research. Networking activity by staff is significantly greater (p<0.01) for NDUs, suggesting they are seen as a resource to other centres.

NDUs are active in research and networking — significantly more so than comparators. We suggest that audit can act as a conduit for implementing research findings and monitoring evidence-based practice.

Key Words: Nursing development unit • Research dissemination • Audit • Networking

Nursing Times Research, Vol. 3, No. 4, 275-288 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/174498719800300407


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?