Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Research in Nursing
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yaghmaie, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Development of a scale for measuring user computer experience

Farideh Yaghmaie

Shaheed Behasthi University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran, Iran, farideh_y2002{at}yahoo.com

The use of computers at work has resulted in researchers searching for factors that affect computer performance and usage. One of the factors that has been identified is user computer experience. However there does not seem to be any consensus on the definition or construct of this. Researchers have either used one-item scales of prior experience or measured the years of experience or number of applications used. Some have recognised the need for multiple measures (Szajna and Mackay, 1995), as it is a multi-dimensional construct. Weil, Rosen, and Wugalter (1990) argued that computer experience measured by such objective measures alone would not necessitate positive attitudes as the subjective nature of experience is important. There is a need for a valid and reliable measure of subjective computer experience for future research on information systems.

The purpose of this study was to develop a scale for measuring subjective computer experience and test its reliability and validity. Item construction was undertaken following a thorough search of the literature, focus groups and interviews with computer experts and users. The subjective computer experience scale (SCES) with 38 Likert-type items was tested for content validity by a panel of ten experts and face validity by 15 students. Following these processes, the scale was reduced to 25 items. The 25-item SCES was distributed to 202 second- and third-year computer science and business students along with Dambrot’s Computer Attitude Scale (CATT). A test-retest of SCES was given to 162 of the same students. Following Principal Component Analysis, a 12-item scale with two factors was selected. An Internal Consistency reliability of 0.97 and 0.66 and a test-retest reliability of 0.80 or 0.65 were found for the two factors. The two factors correlate with the CATT scale of 0.62 and 0.36 respectively. A useful measure of subjective computer experience has been developed, but it needs further validation in different settings.

Key Words: subjective computer experience • development scale • computer experience

Journal of Research in Nursing, Vol. 12, No. 2, 185-190 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1744987106068353


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?