This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Berridge, E.-J. Articles by Gould, D. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Staff appraisal and continuing professional development

Exploring the relationships in acute and community health settings

Health Care Education Development Unit, Institute of Health Sciences, City University, London

Daniel Kelly

School of Health & Social Sciences, Middlesex University, London

Dinah Gould

Health Department of Applied Biological Sciences, Institute of Health Sciences, City University, London

Continuing professional development is important for both individual and service development. Staff appraisal is central to the identification of training needs. Recent health-service reforms in the United Kingdom have linked appraisal and training to pay and career progression. This project aimed to explore the conduct of appraisal and the link between appraisal processes and access to continuing education and training. Focus groups were conducted in an urban acute cancer service and a rural community night nursing service to explore these issues. A total of 29 nurses and allied health professionals participated. Transcripts of focus group discussions were analysed for themes, with a deliberate search for counter-instances. Focus groups revealed that appraisal was perceived as frequently rushed and often appeared undervalued by managers. The purpose of appraisal was often misunderstood; and where no clear link existed between appraisal and access to development opportunities, staff viewed appraisal with antipathy. Commissioning of training was insufficiently responsive to identified needs and appeared overly bureaucratic. The study indicates that the link between appraisal processes and the commissioning of training is insufficiently effective. Process issues that require addressing, as well as recommendations arising from the data, are discussed.

Key Words: staff appraisal • training needs analysis • continuing professional development

Journal of Research in Nursing, Vol. 12, No. 1, 57-70 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1744987106074018


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?