Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Research in Nursing
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Muncey, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Mixing art and science

A bridge over troubled waters or a bridge too far?

Tessa Muncey

Research and Postgraduate Education Homerton School of Health Studies

Nursing commentators exhort that nursing practice is both an art and a science, without really considering the differing philosophical assumptions implicit in the divide. This mixture of competing ideals and philosophies is set within a rigid, fundamentalist medical model of healthcare that compels empirical evidence to be the foundation of decision-making. Some of this evidence is derived from within the emergent methodologies of the social sciences, but there is little credence given to the vast resource of the humanities. The resulting plethora of methodologies has created warring factions between the extremes of the quantitative and qualitative researcher. Beyond this argument is the certainty that the uniting feature of all research is language and, as Bakhtin suggests, ‘language is only in the dialogic interaction of those who make use of it’. To understand how art and science can intertwine to create a human science, an exploration of how nursing is embedded in the heteroglossia of a diverse society is needed. My own developmental journey into the world of research illustrates the iteration of multiple influences to find an explanation that feels comfortable. If we taught health carers to think creatively rather than respond unimaginatively, citing evidence as the rationale, perhaps the current paradox of individualised patient care appearing to consist of doing universal tasks to a named person could be avoided.

Key Words: autoethnography • human science • dialogic • Bakhtin

Journal of Research in Nursing, Vol. 11, No. 3, 223-233 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1744987106065122


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Research in NursingHome page
V. Bishop
Editorial
Journal of Research in Nursing, March 1, 2007; 12(2): 105 - 106.
[PDF]