This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Giddings, L. S. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Mixed-methods research

Positivism dressed in drag?

School of Nursing, Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, Aotearoa, New Zealand

The claim that mixed methods is the third methodological movement of the twentieth century could have unexpected consequences for the future of research in the social sciences and health disciplines. Implied is a belief that the mixing of qualitative and quantitative methods will produce the ‘best of both worlds’. This assumption, combined with inherent promises of inclusiveness, takes on a reality and certainty in research findings that serves well the powerful nexus of economic restraint and evidence-based practice. I argue that the use of the terms ‘qualitative’ and ‘quantitative’ as normative descriptors reinforces their binary positioning, effectively marginalising the methodological diversity within them. Ideologically, mixed methods covers for the continuing hegemony of positivism, albeit in its more moderate, postpositivist form. If naively interpreted, mixed methods could become the preferred approach in the teaching and doing of research. Rather than the promotion of more co-operative and complex designs for increasingly complex social and health issues, economic and administrative pressures may lead to demands for the ‘quick fix’ that mixed methods appears to offer.

Key Words: mixed methods • postpositivism • evidenced-based practice • qualitative research • quantitative research • methodology

Journal of Research in Nursing, Vol. 11, No. 3, 195-203 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1744987106064635


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Denscombe Communities of Practice: A Research Paradigm for the Mixed Methods Approach Journal of Mixed Methods Research, July 1, 2008; 2(3): 270 - 283. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Simons Moving from collision to integration: Reflecting on the experience of mixed methods Journal of Research in Nursing, January 1, 2007; 12(1): 73 - 83. [Abstract] [PDF]