| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Universal precautionsA review of knowledge, compliance and strategies to improve practiceHealth Science Swansea Institute of Higher Education
Faculty of Health, South Bank University The purpose of this literature review is to consider key themes from empirical research relating to the knowledge and compliance of universal precautions amongst healthcare practitioners. Utilising international studies, strategies to improve universal precautions are analysed. The review identifies areas of limited knowledge, synthesises existing research and suggests aspects of universal precautions that need to be studied further. A literature search of studies listed in the Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) database was conducted from 19902003, using a number of key words. Review, analysis and synthesis of selected studies were performed. The findings of this review showed that universal precautions are considered an effective means of protecting patients and staff and controlling infection. The consensus from this body of evidence is that, globally, knowledge of universal precautions is inadequate and compliance low. Studies from many countries have shown that specific intervention strategies, such as education, are influential in improving knowledge and compliance. This review concludes that it is imperative that future research examines how the attitudes and beliefs of practitioners can be influenced and changed to reenforce adherence to universal precautions within the clinical practice setting. There remains a lack of evidence on the long-term benefits of practice interventions to improve compliance, and what specific barriers are influential in affecting how healthcare practitioners adopt universal precautions more effectively in their practice.
Key Words: universal precautions compliance knowledge infection control intervention studies standard precautions education handwashing literature review
Journal of Research in Nursing, Vol. 10, No. 5,
529-547 (2005) This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||
