This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Smith, E. Articles by Masterson, A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Developing a service-user framework to shape priorities for nursing and midwifery research

Nursing Research Unit, Kingës College, London

Fiona M. Ross, BSc, PhD, RGN, DN

Nursing Research Unit, Primary Care Kingës College, London

Ann Mackenzie, MA, PhD, RGN, DN

Faculty of Health and Social Care Sciences, Kingston University and St. Georgeës Hospital Medical School

Abigail Masterson, BSc, MSc

Abi Masterson Consulting Limited, Southampton

Many people believe, and government policy recommends, that service users should be involved more in research agenda setting. This paper helps to provide a way of undertaking this, drawing on the approach used in a national research priority setting exercise for nursing and midwifery service delivery and organisation. A framework of service-user expectations for nursing and midwifery services was developed through a process of focus group discussions. Thirty-two participants were recruited from Community Health Councils (CHCs) because of their formal role in linking to health providers and as advocates of local communities. Discussions focused on the main gaps in nursing and midwifery services, priority areas for improvement and ways of involving service users in these developments. Nine broad expectations for nursing and midwifery services were identified and were used as a framework for the alignment of professional stakeholder data and literature and policy analysis. This enabled five priority areas for research to be identified that were important to all of these groups. Targeted sampling, information giving prior to the focus groups, careful explanation of confidentiality and the purpose of the exercise and facilitation skills were important for developing a framework that covered the wide breadth of the topic area. The process also raised important questions for nursing and midwifery research. Conceptual difficulties about balancing service-user control and researcher influence, and the authenticity of the data in representing diversity, were limitations of the approach. A final report is available at www.sdo.lshtm.ac.uk/nursingandmidwifery.

Key Words: user/consumer involvement • research priority • nursing research • midwifery research

Journal of Research in Nursing, Vol. 10, No. 1, 107-118 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/136140960501000101


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?